Selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee: individual, species, and geographical variations have implications for management.
Identifieur interne : 002922 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002921; suivant : 002923Selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee: individual, species, and geographical variations have implications for management.
Auteurs : Joanna Burger [États-Unis] ; Michael Gochfeld ; C. Jeitner ; M. Donio ; T. PittfieldSource :
- EcoHealth [ 1612-9210 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , analysis : Mercury, Selenium, Water Pollutants, Chemical.
- geographic : Tennessee.
- Animals, Chi-Square Distribution, Environmental Monitoring, Fishes, Fresh Water, Species Specificity, Statistics, Nonparametric.
Abstract
Vertebrates, including humans, can experience adverse effects from mercury consumed in fish. Humans often prefer large predatory fish that bioaccumulate high mercury levels. Recent attention has focused on the role of selenium countering mercury toxicity, but there is little research on the selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish. We examine selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee at Poplar Creek which receives ongoing inputs of mercury from the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Y-12 facility. Our objective was to determine variation of the ratios within species that might affect the protectiveness of selenium against mercury toxicity. Within species, the ratio was correlated significantly and positively with fish length only for two species. There was great individual variation in the selenium:mercury molar ratio within each species, except striped bass. The lack of a clear relationship between the selenium:mercury molar ratio and fish length, and the intraspecific variation, suggests that it would be difficult to use the molar ratio in predicting either the risk from mercury toxicity or in devising consumption advisories.
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-012-0761-y
PubMed: 22456727
PubMed Central: PMC4193431
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee: individual, species, and geographical variations have implications for management.</title><author><name sortKey="Burger, Joanna" sort="Burger, Joanna" uniqKey="Burger J" first="Joanna" last="Burger">Joanna Burger</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8082, USA. burger@biology.rutgers.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8082</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">New Jersey</region><settlement type="city">New Brunswick (New Jersey)</settlement></placeName><orgName type="university">Université Rutgers</orgName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gochfeld, Michael" sort="Gochfeld, Michael" uniqKey="Gochfeld M" first="Michael" last="Gochfeld">Michael Gochfeld</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jeitner, C" sort="Jeitner, C" uniqKey="Jeitner C" first="C" last="Jeitner">C. Jeitner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Donio, M" sort="Donio, M" uniqKey="Donio M" first="M" last="Donio">M. Donio</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pittfield, T" sort="Pittfield, T" uniqKey="Pittfield T" first="T" last="Pittfield">T. Pittfield</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22456727</idno><idno type="pmid">22456727</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s10393-012-0761-y</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC4193431</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002A95</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002A95</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002A95</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002A95</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002A95</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee: individual, species, and geographical variations have implications for management.</title><author><name sortKey="Burger, Joanna" sort="Burger, Joanna" uniqKey="Burger J" first="Joanna" last="Burger">Joanna Burger</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8082, USA. burger@biology.rutgers.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8082</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">New Jersey</region><settlement type="city">New Brunswick (New Jersey)</settlement></placeName><orgName type="university">Université Rutgers</orgName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gochfeld, Michael" sort="Gochfeld, Michael" uniqKey="Gochfeld M" first="Michael" last="Gochfeld">Michael Gochfeld</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jeitner, C" sort="Jeitner, C" uniqKey="Jeitner C" first="C" last="Jeitner">C. Jeitner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Donio, M" sort="Donio, M" uniqKey="Donio M" first="M" last="Donio">M. Donio</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pittfield, T" sort="Pittfield, T" uniqKey="Pittfield T" first="T" last="Pittfield">T. Pittfield</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">EcoHealth</title><idno type="eISSN">1612-9210</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals (MeSH)</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution (MeSH)</term><term>Environmental Monitoring (MeSH)</term><term>Fishes (MeSH)</term><term>Fresh Water (MeSH)</term><term>Mercury (analysis)</term><term>Selenium (analysis)</term><term>Species Specificity (MeSH)</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric (MeSH)</term><term>Tennessee (MeSH)</term><term>Water Pollutants, Chemical (analysis)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux (MeSH)</term><term>Eau douce (MeSH)</term><term>Loi du khi-deux (MeSH)</term><term>Mercure (analyse)</term><term>Poissons (MeSH)</term><term>Polluants chimiques de l'eau (analyse)</term><term>Spécificité d'espèce (MeSH)</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique (MeSH)</term><term>Surveillance de l'environnement (MeSH)</term><term>Sélénium (analyse)</term><term>Tennessee (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en"><term>Mercury</term><term>Selenium</term><term>Water Pollutants, Chemical</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Tennessee</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="analyse" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mercure</term><term>Polluants chimiques de l'eau</term><term>Sélénium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution</term><term>Environmental Monitoring</term><term>Fishes</term><term>Fresh Water</term><term>Species Specificity</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux</term><term>Eau douce</term><term>Loi du khi-deux</term><term>Poissons</term><term>Spécificité d'espèce</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Surveillance de l'environnement</term><term>Tennessee</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Vertebrates, including humans, can experience adverse effects from mercury consumed in fish. Humans often prefer large predatory fish that bioaccumulate high mercury levels. Recent attention has focused on the role of selenium countering mercury toxicity, but there is little research on the selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish. We examine selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee at Poplar Creek which receives ongoing inputs of mercury from the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Y-12 facility. Our objective was to determine variation of the ratios within species that might affect the protectiveness of selenium against mercury toxicity. Within species, the ratio was correlated significantly and positively with fish length only for two species. There was great individual variation in the selenium:mercury molar ratio within each species, except striped bass. The lack of a clear relationship between the selenium:mercury molar ratio and fish length, and the intraspecific variation, suggests that it would be difficult to use the molar ratio in predicting either the risk from mercury toxicity or in devising consumption advisories.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22456727</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1612-9210</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>9</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>EcoHealth</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ecohealth</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee: individual, species, and geographical variations have implications for management.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>171-82</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s10393-012-0761-y</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Vertebrates, including humans, can experience adverse effects from mercury consumed in fish. Humans often prefer large predatory fish that bioaccumulate high mercury levels. Recent attention has focused on the role of selenium countering mercury toxicity, but there is little research on the selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish. We examine selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee at Poplar Creek which receives ongoing inputs of mercury from the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Y-12 facility. Our objective was to determine variation of the ratios within species that might affect the protectiveness of selenium against mercury toxicity. Within species, the ratio was correlated significantly and positively with fish length only for two species. There was great individual variation in the selenium:mercury molar ratio within each species, except striped bass. The lack of a clear relationship between the selenium:mercury molar ratio and fish length, and the intraspecific variation, suggests that it would be difficult to use the molar ratio in predicting either the risk from mercury toxicity or in devising consumption advisories.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Burger</LastName><ForeName>Joanna</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8082, USA. burger@biology.rutgers.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gochfeld</LastName><ForeName>Michael</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jeitner</LastName><ForeName>C</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Donio</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pittfield</LastName><ForeName>T</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>P30 ES005022</GrantID><Acronym>ES</Acronym><Agency>NIEHS NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>P30ES005022</GrantID><Acronym>ES</Acronym><Agency>NIEHS NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>29</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Ecohealth</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101222144</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1612-9202</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014874">Water Pollutants, Chemical</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>FXS1BY2PGL</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D008628">Mercury</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>H6241UJ22B</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012643">Selenium</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016009" MajorTopicYN="N">Chi-Square Distribution</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004784" MajorTopicYN="N">Environmental Monitoring</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005399" MajorTopicYN="Y">Fishes</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005618" MajorTopicYN="N">Fresh Water</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008628" MajorTopicYN="N">Mercury</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="Y">analysis</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012643" MajorTopicYN="N">Selenium</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="Y">analysis</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013045" MajorTopicYN="N">Species Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013714" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Tennessee</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014874" MajorTopicYN="N">Water Pollutants, Chemical</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="Y">analysis</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>04</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>12</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2012</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>25</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22456727</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s10393-012-0761-y</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4193431</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS577621</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Biol Trace Elem Res. 2007 Dec;119(3):195-211</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17916943</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biol Trace Elem Res. 2007 Dec;119(3):255-68</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17916948</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):692-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20410032</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006 Jan-Feb;28(1):49-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16427250</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Res. 1999 Apr;80(3):208-14</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10092441</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Mar;117(3):367-72</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19337510</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Health Perspect. 2005 May;113(5):590-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15866768</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Health Perspect. 2011 May;119(5):607-14</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21220222</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Epidemiol. 2008 May 15;167(10):1171-81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18353804</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Nov;118(11):1584-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20716509</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>N S W Public Health Bull. 2003 Aug;14(8):174-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14578960</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Sci Technol. 2009 May 15;43(10):3919-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19544908</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sci Total Environ. 2002 Nov 1;299(1-3):145-61</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12462581</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012 Apr;31(4):739-47</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22228575</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sci Total Environ. 2011 May 1;409(11):2272-80</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20092877</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Biol Chem. 2008 May 2;283(18):11913-23</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18321861</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Res. 2009 Oct;109(7):803-11</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19643400</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sci Total Environ. 2007 Oct 1;384(1-3):93-105</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17590413</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Res. 2010 Jan;110(1):96-104</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19909946</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biol Trace Elem Res. 1998 Dec;65(3):211-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9892494</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Urban Health. 2003 Jun;80(2):349-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12791809</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Drug Chem Toxicol. 2000 Feb;23(1):41-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10711388</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Apr;111(4):604-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12676623</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 22;278(1713):1851-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21123262</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecohealth. 2008 Dec;5(4):456-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19198945</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sci Total Environ. 2000 Oct 16;261(1-3):9-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11036973</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Res. 2004 Oct;96(2):145-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15325875</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Neurotoxicology. 2005 Aug;26(4):511-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15979722</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;88(6):1618-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19064523</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Res. 2003 Jul;92(3):254-61</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12804522</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Jun;6(6):1894-916</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19578467</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Circulation. 2002 Nov 19;106(21):2747-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12438303</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Pediatr. 2000 May;136(5):599-605</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10802490</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sci Total Environ. 2011 Mar 15;409(8):1418-29</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21292311</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biol Trace Elem Res. 1987 Apr;12(1):109-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24254592</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Mar;113(3):266-71</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15743713</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Manage. 2011 Jun;47(6):1064-76</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21380788</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Pollut. 1991;71(2-4):131-69</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15092118</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1978 Mar;19(3):273-80</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">647130</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nutrition. 2010 Feb;26(2):168-74</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19487105</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecotoxicology. 2002 Aug;11(4):213-31</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12211695</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Manage. 2011 Jun;47(6):1096-111</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21207027</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010 Oct;29(10):2133-4; author reply 2134</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20872672</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecohealth. 2008 Dec;5(4):442-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19365692</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1981;10(3):305-19</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7259299</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Manage. 2011 Jun;47(6):1125-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21476067</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biol Trace Elem Res. 2005 Jan;103(1):17-35</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15695845</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Toxicology. 2010 Nov 28;278(1):112-23</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20561558</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 28;347(22):1747-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12456850</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Neurotoxicology. 2008 Sep;29(5):802-11</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18761370</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Res. 2001 Oct;87(2):108-18</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11683594</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1997 Nov-Dec;19(6):417-28</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9392777</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012 Apr;62(3):519-28</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22042039</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biol Trace Elem Res. 2007 Dec;119(3):242-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17916947</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Risk Anal. 2001 Jun;21(3):533-44</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11572431</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>New Jersey</li></region><settlement><li>New Brunswick (New Jersey)</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université Rutgers</li></orgName></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Donio, M" sort="Donio, M" uniqKey="Donio M" first="M" last="Donio">M. Donio</name><name sortKey="Gochfeld, Michael" sort="Gochfeld, Michael" uniqKey="Gochfeld M" first="Michael" last="Gochfeld">Michael Gochfeld</name><name sortKey="Jeitner, C" sort="Jeitner, C" uniqKey="Jeitner C" first="C" last="Jeitner">C. Jeitner</name><name sortKey="Pittfield, T" sort="Pittfield, T" uniqKey="Pittfield T" first="T" last="Pittfield">T. Pittfield</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="New Jersey"><name sortKey="Burger, Joanna" sort="Burger, Joanna" uniqKey="Burger J" first="Joanna" last="Burger">Joanna Burger</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002922 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002922 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22456727
|texte= Selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee: individual, species, and geographical variations have implications for management.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22456727" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |